← Search

Caleb Bundy

Toledo, OH
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
67 matches · 44W–23L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Caleb Bundy to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history67 matches
L
Michael Kreitzer
2026-08-09 · #2 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-0, 0-1
W
Christopher Bolinger
2026-08-08 · #2 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
W
2026-07-28 · NWO 18&Over 4.0M Damschroder-Jermain · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-07-23 · NWO 18&Over 4.0M Damschroder-Jermain · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
N/A
2026-07-21 · NWO 18&Over 4.0M Damschroder-Jermain · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-07-20 · NWO 18&Over 4.5M Uribes-BGSU · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with James Kaczorowski
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W
Nathan Kyllo
2026-07-14 · NWO 18&Over 4.0M Damschroder-Jermain · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-0
L
2026-07-13 · NWO 18&Over 4.5M Uribes-BGSU · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Braden Tucker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
W
Matthew Fillmore / Andrew Fillmore
2026-06-30 · NWO 18&Over 4.0M Damschroder-Jermain · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jacob Rabenhorst
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-5
L
2026-06-16 · NWO 18&Over 4.0M Damschroder-Jermain · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L
Zenonn Zaleski
2026-06-15 · NWO 18&Over 4.5M Uribes-BGSU · #2 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 1-6
W
2026-06-09 · NWO 18&Over 4.0M Damschroder-Jermain · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams10 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
100%
8W–0L · 63.3% of games
4.0
72.7%
24W–9L · 62.8% of games
4.5
40%
4W–6L · 44% of games
7.5
55.6%
5W–4L · 53.4% of games
7.0mixed
50%
2W–2L · 53.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Singles, 37% of the time
#2 Singles
37%
25 matches
#1 Doubles
24%
16 matches
#1 Singles
18%
12 matches
#2 Doubles
12%
8 matches
#3 Doubles
9%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova