← Search

Lydia Romero

— year-end
105 matches · 61W–44L · seasons 2021–2027

Captains: add Lydia Romero to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history105 matches
L
2026-09-03 · 3.5 PTC3 Battlecats W18F · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Heather Zimmer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-7
L
2026-08-27 · 3.5 PTC3 Battlecats W18F · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Heather Zimmer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-08-17 · 6.5 PTC Battlecats WMonPM · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Cindy Brown
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-1, 1-0
L
2026-08-03 · 6.5 PTC Battlecats WMonPM · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Cindy Brown
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 4-3, 0-1
W
2026-08-01 · 6.5 PTC Battlecats WMonPM · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Emily Blum
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
L
2026-07-27 · 6.5 PTC Battlecats WMonPM · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Vicki Copeland
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-08 · 6.5 PTC Battlecats WMonPM · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Cindy Brown
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
L
2026-03-05 · 3.5 PTC Battlecats W18S · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Emily Blum
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-7
L
2026-02-26 · 3.5 PTC Battlecats W18S · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 3-6
L
Laura Pierce
2026-02-25 · 3.5 PTC Zimmer/Brauer W40S · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-02-11 · 3.5 PTC Zimmer/Brauer W40S · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-02-05 · 3.5 PTC Battlecats W18S · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-3
Teams29 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
2.5
70%
7W–3L · 55.9% of games
3.0
52.3%
23W–21L · 51% of games
3.5
50%
6W–6L · 52.7% of games
5.5
91.7%
11W–1L · 69.5% of games
6.0
66.7%
4W–2L · 47.8% of games
6.5
40%
4W–6L · 44.7% of games
3.0mixed
60%
3W–2L · 48.9% of games
6.5mixed
50%
3W–3L · 57.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 48% of the time
#1 Doubles
48%
50 matches
#2 Doubles
21%
22 matches
#1 Singles
15%
16 matches
#3 Doubles
11%
12 matches
#2 Singles
5%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You can get through anything if you keep going one point at a time.
Arthur Ashe