← Search

Lindsey Simpson

— year-end
49 matches · 29W–20L · seasons 2025–2026

Captains: add Lindsey Simpson to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history49 matches
W
2026-09-02 · Homewood - Bingham/Lacey · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Ann Wade Shreve
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-19 · PTCC - Ebert · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Michelle Kelly
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-08-04 · Hoover Met - BOWDEN · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Leah Taylor
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-07-29 · PTCC - Ebert · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Terri Lynn Wallace
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-07-29 · Homewood - Bingham/Lacey · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Alisha Mckay
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-07-28 · Hoover Met - BOWDEN · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Alison Venhuizen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-7
W
2026-07-22 · Homewood - Bingham/Lacey · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Elizabeth Morgan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 5-7, 1-0
L
2026-07-15 · PTCC - Ebert · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Maurine Halpern
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 1-6, 0-1
L
2026-06-23 · Pine Tree - Ebert · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ann Wade Shreve
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 4-6
W
2026-06-23 · Homewood - Haines · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ann Wade Shreve
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
2026-06-22 · Homewood - Haines · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ann Wade Shreve
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 3-6
W
2026-06-15 · Homewood - Haines · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ann Wade Shreve
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-0
Teams26 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
4.0
60%
18W–12L · 55.2% of games
4.5
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
7.5
60%
3W–2L · 57.3% of games
8.5
80%
4W–1L · 54.9% of games
3.5mixed
100%
4W–0L · 71.4% of games
4.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 41% of the time
#2 Doubles
41%
20 matches
#1 Doubles
37%
18 matches
#3 Doubles
22%
11 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe