← Search

David Hammons

Beaumont, TX
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
65 matches · 30W–35L · seasons 2025–2026

Captains: add David Hammons to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history65 matches
W
2026-08-26 · HAMILTON/HARRINGTON · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Parker Martinka
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
2026-05-11 · DAVID HAMMONS · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with John Evanko
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 2-6
L
Rylan Smart / Noah Charles
2026-04-22 · DAVID HAMMONS · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with John Evanko
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-04-20 · DAVID HAMMONS · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jeff Curl
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W
Ashley Stone / Casey Hargroder
2026-04-13 · DAVID HAMMONS · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with John Evanko
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
L
Matthew Hall / Jason Harrington
2026-03-28 · MARC MERCADO · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kyle Stratton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-7
L
2026-03-14 · MARC MERCADO · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Quang Tran
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-03-03 · MARC MERCADO · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Larry Keon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-02-24 · MARC MERCADO · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jim Lancaster
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-02-16 · DARA WOODRUFF · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Michelle Foster mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-4
W
2026-02-11 · DAVID HAMMONS · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Gary Cobb
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
L
2026-02-04 · DAVID HAMMONS · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Derek Mireles
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams56 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.0
65%
13W–7L · 57.5% of games
3.5
20%
3W–12L · 32.7% of games
4.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0
28.6%
2W–5L · 49.6% of games
6.0mixed
66.7%
10W–5L · 55.8% of games
7.0mixed
16.7%
1W–5L · 38.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 43% of the time
#2 Doubles
43%
28 matches
#3 Doubles
32%
21 matches
#1 Doubles
22%
14 matches
#2 Singles
3%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer