← Search

Colleen Comer

Mobile, AL
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
112 matches · 52W–60L · seasons 2024–2027

Captains: add Colleen Comer to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history112 matches
W
2026-08-25 · MTC - Lamar/Terrell · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rosa Lamar
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
2026-07-07 · MTC - Lamar/Terrell · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Paige Graf
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-5
W
2026-06-30 · MTC - Lamar/Terrell · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Carly Maltese
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
Angela Krause / Jennifer McCurdy
2026-06-29 · GS - Crowley · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Laura Bertolini
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 7-5
L
2026-06-25 · MTC - Lamar/Terrell · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Colleen Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-06-12 · MTC - Lamar/Terrell · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Rosa Lamar
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-10 · GS - Crowley · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Gail Mathews
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-7
L
2026-06-08 · MTC - Lamar/Terrell · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Kim Pugh
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-7
W
2026-05-20 · GS - Crowley · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Laura Bertolini
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-13 · GS - Crowley · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Amanda Jean Tulowitzki
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
W
2026-04-21 · MTC - Lamar/Terrell · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Laurel Wallace
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-04-01 · MTC - Lamar/Terrell · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kim Pugh
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-7
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams39 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
59.3%
32W–22L · 52.7% of games
3.5
30%
12W–28L · 44.3% of games
5.5
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.5
41.7%
5W–7L · 45.3% of games
3.0mixed
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.5mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 33% of the time
#2 Doubles
33%
37 matches
#1 Doubles
28%
31 matches
#3 Doubles
26%
29 matches
#1 Singles
6%
7 matches
#2 Singles
5%
5 matches
#4 Doubles
3%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Start where you are. Use what you have. Do what you can.
Arthur Ashe