← Search

Jacqueline Jacobs

Lexington, SC
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
104 matches · 42W–62L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Jacqueline Jacobs to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history104 matches
L
2026-02-28 · CTL55/Mosley/GV · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Doris Mosley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 1-6, 0-1
L
2025-12-13 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Peggy Dingle
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
2025-11-15 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sabrina Moore
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-6
W
Deborah Conroy / Sharon Brown
2025-10-09 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Shirley Myers
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
2025-09-10 · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jackie Belcher-Cook
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-7
W
2025-08-20 · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jackie Belcher-Cook
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
L
2025-07-26 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jim Brown Jr mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 7-5, 0-1
L
Robert White / Mary Wright
2025-07-19 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jahid Boukouch mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 1-6
L
2025-06-28 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Steven Woodward mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 1-6
L
2025-04-21 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Joanne Guyton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
L
2025-04-15 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Renee Mines
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
2025-03-15 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sabrina Moore
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams6 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
2.5
63.2%
24W–14L · 52.3% of games
3.0
31.1%
14W–31L · 39.8% of games
3.5
11.1%
1W–8L · 22.2% of games
5.5
28.6%
2W–5L · 46.7% of games
6.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.0mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 29% of the time
#2 Doubles
29%
30 matches
#1 Doubles
28%
29 matches
#1 Singles
21%
22 matches
#3 Doubles
19%
20 matches
#2 Singles
3%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova