← Search

Doris Dermann

Lincoln, NE
2.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
11 matches · 1W–10L · seasons 2021–2025

Captains: add Doris Dermann to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history11 matches
W
2025-06-02 · OShea · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Leah Albers
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-0, 1-0
L
2025-06-01 · OShea · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Leah Albers
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2025-05-12 · OShea · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with TIFFANY MULLISON
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
L
2025-05-05 · OShea · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with TIFFANY MULLISON
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
2025-01-26 · OShea · #4 Doubles · 3.0 · with Siobhan Ebers
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2024-06-24 · O'Shea · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with TIFFANY MULLISON
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
L
2024-03-03 · Olson · #4 Doubles · 3.0 · with Linda Friedrich
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
L
2024-02-04 · Olson · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Susan Messersmith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
L
Jennifer Gray / Margaret Brockman
2021-02-28 · Shultz/Olson · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kari Klozenbucher
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
Pam Oliver / Jennifer Gray
2021-02-06 · Shultz/Olson · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Julie Schmidt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 4-6
L
2021-01-24 · Shultz/Olson · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams6 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level1 levels played
3.0
9.1%
1W–10L · 26.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 64% of the time
#3 Doubles
64%
7 matches
#4 Doubles
18%
2 matches
#1 Singles
9%
1 match
#2 Doubles
9%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer