← Search

Meagan Lee

— year-end
63 matches · 27W–36L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Meagan Lee to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history63 matches
W
2026-08-25 · Parks - CCNC · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Courtney McGuirt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-3
W
2026-08-18 · Parks - CCNC · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Courtney McGuirt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-08-17 · Booth - Pinehurst Resort · #3 Doubles · 5.5 · with Capel Brendel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-08-16 · Booth - Pinehurst Resort · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Victoria Adkins
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-07-21 · Lee - CCNC · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Katia Weaver
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
L
2026-07-16 · Lee - CCNC · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Cornelia Morris
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
L
2026-06-16 · Lee - CCNC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Fincher
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-09 · Lee - CCNC · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jen Barton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-06-04 · Lee - CCNC · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Catherine Robinette
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-05-21 · Lee - CCNC · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Hayes Lemons
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-7
L
2026-05-13 · Parks - CCNC · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Leigh Neville
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-05-12 · Lee - CCNC · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Hayes Lemons
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
Teams19 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
53.1%
17W–15L · 49.5% of games
3.5
0%
0W–7L · 33.1% of games
4.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
5.5
62.5%
5W–3L · 56.7% of games
6.5
36.4%
4W–7L · 44.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 35% of the time
#2 Doubles
35%
22 matches
#3 Doubles
33%
21 matches
#1 Doubles
19%
12 matches
#2 Singles
8%
5 matches
#1 Singles
5%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova