← Search

Amanda Eagan

Matthews, NC
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
88 matches · 55W–33L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Amanda Eagan to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history88 matches
W
2026-09-14 · AEagan/SSamuelson (WRSC) · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Kelli Massaro
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-31 · AEagan/SSamuelson (WRSC) · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Emily Brandon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-08-28 · KKeen/LMadonna (WSRC) · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Wesley Kuenne
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-08-24 · AEagan/SSamuelson (WRSC) · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with April Greer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-08-15 · #3 Doubles · with Kelly Keen championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-07-26 · SSamuelson/KKeen (WSRC) · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Madhava Kalakota mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-2
W
2026-07-22 · MJones (WSRC) · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kelly Keen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-5
L
Trisha Smith / Kenneth Godfrey
2026-07-09 · SSamuelson/KKeen (WSRC) · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with MAGESH ARUMUGAM mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-07-02 · SSamuelson/KKeen (WSRC) · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Ken Klug mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 2-6
W
2026-06-24 · MJones (WSRC) · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Carleigh Miller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 0-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-10 · MJones (WSRC) · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Carleigh Miller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-6
W
2026-06-04 · SSamuelson/KKeen (WSRC) · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Madhava Kalakota mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams25 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
2.5
100%
5W–0L · 63.6% of games
3.0
76.7%
23W–7L · 57.9% of games
3.5
31.2%
5W–11L · 37.2% of games
5.5
37.5%
3W–5L · 50.3% of games
6.5
61.5%
8W–5L · 54.9% of games
3.0mixed
75%
6W–2L · 63.5% of games
6.0mixed
60%
3W–2L · 48.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 48% of the time
#1 Doubles
48%
42 matches
#2 Doubles
23%
20 matches
#3 Doubles
18%
16 matches
#1 Singles
9%
8 matches
#2 Singles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Start where you are. Use what you have. Do what you can.
Arthur Ashe