← Search

Daniel Grant

Centerville, OH
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
63 matches · 30W–33L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Daniel Grant to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history63 matches
W
2026-05-01 · KTC-Grant · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-04-26 · KTC-Grant · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 1-6, 1-0
W
Isaac Bokros
2026-04-18 · KTC-Grant · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 5-7, 1-0
W
Alexander Chappars / Marques Johnson
2026-03-29 · KTC-Grant · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Peter Ekeh
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
L
Emil Filc
2026-03-20 · KTC-Grant · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-6
L
2026-03-08 · KTC-Keaton · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-03-07 · KTC-Grant · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-02-28 · KTC-Keaton · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Joseph Drapalik
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-02-15 · KTC-Grant · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-02-07 · KTC-Grant · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Daniel Dull
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 3-6
W
2026-01-24 · KTC-Grant · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Ramzi Nahhas
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-01-18 · KTC-Grant · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams18 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
45.1%
23W–28L · 47.7% of games
3.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
60%
3W–2L · 52.9% of games
7.0mixed
60%
3W–2L · 53.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Singles, 30% of the time
#2 Singles
30%
19 matches
#3 Doubles
24%
15 matches
#1 Singles
18%
11 matches
#2 Doubles
16%
10 matches
#1 Doubles
13%
8 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer