← Search

Eryl Ragasa

Stafford, TX
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
35 matches · 16W–19L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Eryl Ragasa to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history35 matches
W
2026-08-17 · Missouri City - All Frame · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Warren Diec
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-08-04 · Missouri City - All Frame · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Warren Diec
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-27 · Missouri City - All Frame · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Warren Diec
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
2026-07-20 · Missouri City - All Frame · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Matthew Watts
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
L
2025-10-30 · Missouri City · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kevin Campbell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-7, 0-1
L
2025-10-16 · Missouri City · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Andrew Garza
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
2025-10-02 · Missouri City · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with TROY JEFFERSON
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
L
2025-09-25 · Missouri City · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Juan Guzman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2025-08-26 · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Vincent Tran
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 4-6, 0-1
W
2025-07-28 · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Joshua Chou
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
2025-06-19 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Phillip Truong
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-1
W
2025-06-12 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Henry Vu
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams9 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
2.5
66.7%
4W–2L · 59.6% of games
3.5
52.4%
11W–10L · 52% of games
4.0
12.5%
1W–7L · 38.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 31% of the time
#2 Doubles
31%
11 matches
#1 Doubles
26%
9 matches
#1 Singles
23%
8 matches
#2 Singles
11%
4 matches
#3 Doubles
9%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova