← Search

Caroline Niezelski

Yardley, PA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
68 matches · 42W–26L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Caroline Niezelski to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history68 matches
W
2026-06-24 · Courtageous · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Courtney Thomas
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-06-17 · Courtageous · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Courtney Thomas
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-06-13 · Smart Aces · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Wendy Kraus
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-06-10 · Courtageous · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Katie Grennan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-06-06 · Smart Aces · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Courtney Thomas
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
Katie Johnson / Millie Chandler
2026-06-03 · Courtageous · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Courtney Thomas
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-05-27 · Courtageous · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Courtney Thomas
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-05-20 · Courtageous · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Courtney Thomas
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-05-16 · Smart Aces · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Courtney Thomas
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-05-09 · Smart Aces · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kathleen Raftery
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-7
W
2026-05-06 · Courtageous · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Courtney Thomas
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-03-15 · Tenacious Topspin · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Brad Miller mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 0-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams12 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.5
60.9%
14W–9L · 56.4% of games
4.0
42.9%
3W–4L · 46.6% of games
6.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
80%
4W–1L · 51.1% of games
8.0mixed
63%
17W–10L · 53.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 40% of the time
#1 Doubles
40%
27 matches
#2 Doubles
24%
16 matches
#3 Doubles
24%
16 matches
#1 Singles
12%
8 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert