← Search

Jeremiah Montgomery

Goldsboro, NC
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
59 matches · 40W–19L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Jeremiah Montgomery to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history59 matches
W
2026-09-13 · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Troy Robinson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-09-08 · GR-Haislip (18s 7.5M) Guys · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jonathan Davis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-08-20 · GR-Harrison (18s 6.5M) Guys · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Greg Baggett
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-13 · GR-Harrison (18s 6.5M) Guys · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Matlock Stocks
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
W
2026-07-30 · GR-Hare (40s 3.5 MX) · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Whitney Musgrave mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-07-28 · GR - Haislip · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-07-22 · Greene Ridge · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Andrew Harrison
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
W
David Atkins / Kerry Smith
2026-07-21 · GR - Taylor Mixed · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jessica Beissner mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-07-09 · GR - Haislip · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-7
W
2026-07-08 · Greene Ridge · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Banks Nimmo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-06-24 · Greene Ridge · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Banks Nimmo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
W
2026-06-18 · GR - Haislip · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams34 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
2.5
85.7%
6W–1L · 63.9% of games
3.0
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
3.5
73.3%
11W–4L · 58.3% of games
4.0
50%
9W–9L · 49.7% of games
6.5
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.5
75%
3W–1L · 55% of games
8.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.5mixed
88.9%
8W–1L · 67.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 25% of the time
#1 Doubles
25%
15 matches
#2 Doubles
22%
13 matches
#3 Doubles
20%
12 matches
#2 Singles
19%
11 matches
#1 Singles
9%
5 matches
#3 Singles
5%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova