← Search

Joy Eleby

— year-end
50 matches · 41W–9L · seasons 2022–2027

Captains: add Joy Eleby to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history50 matches
W
2026-07-07 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Janie Mitchell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-06-28 · Anthony Flanagan Park (Joy Eleby)* · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nkeiru Ojemaye-Abell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-06-23 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Traci Jordan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-06-17 · Anthony Flanagan Park (Joy Eleby)* · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ellen Goldwasser
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 5-7, 2-0
L
2026-06-14 · Anthony Flanagan Park (Joy Eleby)* · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jenna Green
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 2-6
W
2026-06-09 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Crysenthia Stewart
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
W
2026-04-03 · Providence (Ashleigh Drain)* · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Amir Ali mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 7-5
W
2026-03-27 · Providence (Ashleigh Drain)* · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sekou Muhammad mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-03-20 · Providence (Ashleigh Drain)* · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Dorian Harrell mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-03-10 · Barnes Mill (Crysenthia Stewart)* · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Crysenthia Stewart
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-5
W
2026-03-09 · Providence (Ashleigh Drain)* · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Graeme Reid mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-03-03 · Barnes Mill (Crysenthia Stewart)* · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Naranja Davis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
Teams10 teams · 2022–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
2.5
80%
4W–1L · 70.2% of games
3.0
75%
6W–2L · 60.2% of games
3.5
86.4%
19W–3L · 67.2% of games
4.0
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5mixed
90%
9W–1L · 62.8% of games
4.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 46% of the time
#1 Doubles
46%
23 matches
#1 Singles
18%
9 matches
#2 Doubles
16%
8 matches
#3 Doubles
16%
8 matches
#2 Singles
2%
1 match
#4 Doubles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer