← Search

Tyler Hopkins

— year-end
49 matches · 30W–19L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Tyler Hopkins to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history49 matches
L
Zachary Berning / Charles Ewing
2026-08-30 · Ward/Knoxville · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Michael Lucero
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-08-16 · Ward/Knoxville · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Michael Lucero
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-05-24 · Ward/Knoxville · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Troy Getty
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-05-03 · Ward/Knoxville · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-04-27 · Ward/Knoxville · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
William Brown / Matt Whitehead
2026-04-12 · Ward/Knoxville · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Daniel Waite
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
W
2026-03-08 · Ward/Knoxville · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Christopher Craig
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
W
2026-02-13 · Ward/Knoxville · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Zachary Keith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
2026-02-07 · Ward/Knoxville · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Daniel Waite
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-01-10 · Ward/Knoxville · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Scott Price
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2025-11-30 · Ward/Knoxville · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 0-0
W
2025-11-16 · Ward/Knoxville · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
Teams12 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.0
100%
5W–0L · 81.1% of games
3.5
51.9%
14W–13L · 52.1% of games
4.0
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.0
50%
2W–2L · 47.4% of games
6.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
80%
4W–1L · 53.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 25% of the time
#1 Singles
25%
12 matches
#1 Doubles
22%
11 matches
#2 Singles
18%
9 matches
#1 Male Doubles
12%
6 matches
#2 Doubles
10%
5 matches
#3 Doubles
10%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert