← Search

Jay Yee

Beltsville, MD
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
203 matches · 137W–66L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Jay Yee to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history203 matches
W
2026-09-03 · Team 3 Net Dominators Rabbit Grillers · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Anthony Nguyen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 2-1
W
2026-09-01 · HocoCha 8.5X · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Virginia Fung mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 7-6, 1-0
L
2026-08-17 · HocoCha 8.5X · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Susan Rhee mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 4-6
L
2026-08-11 · Cebulash - Who Is We? Rabbit Grillers · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Raghu Menon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-2, 0-1
W
2026-08-04 · Cha · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Luis Lozano
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
W
2026-07-29 · Cha · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Roderick Peyton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-07-16 · Cha · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Luis Lozano
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
Scott Gelbman / Daniel Park
2026-07-14 · Cebulash - Who Is We? Rabbit Grillers · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Changfu Xiao
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-07-02 · Cebulash - Who Is We? Rabbit Grillers · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Del Carden
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 5-7, 1-0
W
2026-06-13 · #1 Doubles · with Julianne Nitta championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-4
L
2026-06-12 · #2 Doubles · with Julianne Nitta championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-7, 0-1
L
2026-06-06 · Cedar Sprint · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Raghu Menon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams63 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level10 levels played
3.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
4.0
78.1%
57W–16L · 60.2% of games
4.5
55.6%
20W–16L · 54.3% of games
7.5
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
8.5
81.8%
9W–2L · 62.5% of games
0.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
4.0mixed
50%
2W–2L · 48.6% of games
8.0mixed
62.5%
10W–6L · 57.6% of games
8.5mixed
63.6%
7W–4L · 55.7% of games
9.0mixed
42.9%
6W–8L · 45.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 35% of the time
#1 Doubles
35%
71 matches
#2 Doubles
25%
50 matches
#3 Doubles
19%
38 matches
#2 Singles
8%
17 matches
#1 Singles
8%
16 matches
#3 Singles
5%
11 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova