← Search

Anjanette Steadman

Englewood, CO
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
97 matches · 63W–34L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Anjanette Steadman to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history97 matches
W
2026-08-17 · CCV RED · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Amber Salwisz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-07-27 · CCV RED · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Michelle Markoff
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-07-20 · CCV RED · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Michelle Markoff
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-07-13 · CCV BLUE · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-07-06 · CCV BLUE · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Charmaine Jiner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-29 · CCV BLUE · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Michelle Markoff
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-1
W
2026-06-22 · CCV BLUE · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Michelle Markoff
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
W
2026-05-28 · CCV RED · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Charmaine Jiner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-05-25 · CCV RED · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Michelle Markoff
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-05-20 · LTFC NAVY · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jennifer DeLurgio
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-05-15 · CCV RED · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Charmaine Jiner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-05-11 · CCV RED · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Michelle Markoff
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams21 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
0.0
60%
6W–4L · 48.2% of games
2.5
48.6%
17W–18L · 51.5% of games
3.0
76.9%
40W–12L · 60.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 34% of the time
#1 Doubles
34%
33 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
28 matches
#3 Doubles
13%
13 matches
#1 Singles
11%
11 matches
#1 Female Doubles
8%
8 matches
#1 Female Singles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer