← Search

Daniel Routh

Englewood, CO
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
162 matches · 129W–33L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Daniel Routh to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history162 matches
W
2026-09-01 · GAC BLUE · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with DAVID SERAFIN
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-1
W
2026-08-18 · GAC BLUE · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Paul Buckner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-08-11 · GAC BLUE · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-08-09 · GAC PURPLE · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Laura Routh mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-08-04 · GAC BLUE · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Paul Buckner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-28 · GAC BLUE · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Paul Buckner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
L
2026-07-12 · GAC PURPLE · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Cynthia Wessinger mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-06-30 · GAC BLUE · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Vic Alejandro
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-06-28 · GAC GREEN · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Laura Routh mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-0
L
2026-06-23 · GAC BLUE · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Bret Hansen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-06-21 · GAC GREEN · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Laura Routh mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-2
W
2026-06-07 · GAC GREEN · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Anna Stansbury mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams32 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.5
79.4%
50W–13L · 60.2% of games
7.0
87.5%
7W–1L · 67.6% of games
6.0mixed
85.7%
6W–1L · 70.8% of games
6.5mixed
91.7%
11W–1L · 68.4% of games
7.0mixed
91.9%
34W–3L · 71.2% of games
7.5mixed
66.7%
6W–3L · 57.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 49% of the time
#1 Doubles
49%
79 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
43 matches
#3 Doubles
15%
25 matches
#2 Singles
6%
9 matches
#1 Singles
4%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova