← Search

Michael Butler

— year-end
84 matches · 50W–34L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Michael Butler to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history84 matches
W
2026-08-30 · Sumrall 6.5 · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Andy Woodard
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
L
2026-08-23 · Sumrall 6.5 · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Chad Carmichael
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-08-20 · Butler 5.5 · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Jason Brown
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-7, 1-0
W
2026-08-16 · Blackledge Petal · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Alen Hajnal
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 5-4
W
2026-08-09 · Sumrall 6.5 · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Patrick Dauphin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
W
2026-08-02 · Sumrall 6.5 · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jamie Massengale
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
W
2026-07-26 · Butler 2.5-3.5 · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Allen Boleware
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-07-13 · Hattiesburg 3.0 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Paula Morris mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-4
W
2026-07-12 · Blackledge Petal · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Shea Malone
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
Tyler Watkins / Roberto Amay
2026-06-28 · Butler 2.5-3.5 · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Bobby Hanson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-06-08 · Hattiesburg 3.0 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with McKenzie Woodard mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-3
W
2026-05-18 · Hattiesburg 3.0 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with McKenzie Woodard mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-4
Teams44 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
2.5
85.7%
12W–2L · 64.7% of games
3.0
48.1%
13W–14L · 51.5% of games
3.5
33.3%
2W–4L · 45.2% of games
5.5
72.7%
8W–3L · 55.8% of games
6.5
50%
3W–3L · 52.1% of games
2.5mixed
100%
6W–0L · 76.8% of games
3.0mixed
42.9%
6W–8L · 48.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 25% of the time
#1 Doubles
25%
21 matches
#2 Doubles
24%
20 matches
#2 Singles
19%
16 matches
#3 Doubles
18%
15 matches
#1 Singles
7%
6 matches
#3 Singles
7%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova