← Search

Mitchell Todd

Portland, OR
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
82 matches · 43W–39L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Mitchell Todd to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history82 matches
W
2026-07-31 · WHRC-Mehlhorn · #3 Doubles · 0.0 · with Randall Sinn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-07-17 · WHRC-Mehlhorn · #2 Doubles · 0.0 · with Randall Sinn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-3
L
2026-06-28 · #3 Doubles · with Manoj Agnihotri championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
W
2026-06-27 · #3 Doubles · with Manoj Agnihotri championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-2
W
2026-06-27 · #1 Doubles · with Manoj Agnihotri championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
L
2026-06-26 · #2 Doubles · with Kirk Greiner championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-04 · WHRC-Mehlhorn · #1 Doubles · 0.0 · with Jim Borell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-05-15 · WHRC-Todd · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Daniel Boyce
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-05-05 · WHRC-Becker/Melhorn · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Makoto Sakaguchi
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-7
L
2026-05-01 · WHRC-Becker/Melhorn · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with William Pettis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-5, 0-1
W
2026-04-23 · WHRC-Todd · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Thomas Mehlhorn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-04-07 · WHRC-Todd · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Steven Grant
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams18 teams · 2022–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
0.0
71.4%
5W–2L · 53.8% of games
3.0
35.7%
10W–18L · 46.4% of games
6.0
80.8%
21W–5L · 59.6% of games
7.0
33.3%
2W–4L · 45.8% of games
6.0mixed
25%
1W–3L · 46.8% of games
7.0mixed
25%
1W–3L · 43% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 34% of the time
#3 Doubles
34%
28 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
27 matches
#1 Doubles
28%
23 matches
#2 Singles
4%
3 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams