← Search

Mark Hankins

— year-end
84 matches · 26W–58L · seasons 2021–2027

Captains: add Mark Hankins to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history84 matches
L
2026-09-13 · CHI E 55M7.0 7.RT Peroussanov Sun 4 $29 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Andrew Rubanovich
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-08-14 · NITA S 65CMXe Huntley-Lawver · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Sarah Campagna mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 1-3
L
2026-07-19 · NITA S 35M40b Huntley-Lawver/Cislak · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mark Stricker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 4-6
W
2026-07-18 · NITA S 35M40b Huntley-Lawver/Cislak · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Craig Williams
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
L
2026-07-12 · NITA S 35M40b Huntley-Lawver/Cislak · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Carlos Canga-Arguelles
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-07-12 · NITA S 35M40b Huntley-Lawver/Cislak · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Hugo Salgado
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
N/A
2026-06-13 · NITA S 35M40b Huntley-Lawver/Cislak · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Carlos Canga-Arguelles
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-06-09 · NITA S 65CMXe Huntley-Lawver · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Marie Venckus mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-06-07 · NITA S 35M40b Huntley-Lawver/Cislak · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Parker Turnipseed
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-05-31 · NITA S 35M40b Huntley-Lawver/Cislak · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Hugo Salgado
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-6
W
2026-02-08 · NITA W 65CMXb NMHFC-Lawver · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Abigail Torres mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-4
L
2026-01-31 · CDTA W 55&OM7.0 2.RT Peroussanov Sat 8 $27 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with David Meltz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
Teams21 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
25%
16W–48L · 41.1% of games
7.0
25%
1W–3L · 32.9% of games
6.5mixed
58.3%
7W–5L · 54.9% of games
7.0mixed
50%
2W–2L · 44.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 55% of the time
#3 Doubles
55%
46 matches
#2 Doubles
37%
31 matches
#1 Doubles
7%
6 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams