← Search

Abby Odmark

Indianapolis, IN
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
61 matches · 50W–11L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Abby Odmark to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history61 matches
W
2026-07-08 · Indy A18 4.0W WHS Dumas · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Emily Turner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-4
L
2026-06-23 · Indy A18 4.0W WHS Dumas · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kaley Faust
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 5-7
W
Molly Heinz / Sara Ingham-Straw
2026-05-10 · Indy 7.5W SAT CRC Lynch · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Beth Pychinka
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 7-5
W
2026-04-11 · Indy 7.5W SAT CRC Lynch · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Robin Lee
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-1
L
2026-03-01 · Indy A18 4.0W SUN CRC Hill · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kaley Faust
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 5-7, 0-1
W
2026-02-22 · Indy A18 4.0W SUN CRC Hill · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Camellia Poplarski
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-02-01 · Indy A18 4.0W SUN CRC Hill · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Becky Tubergen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
L
2025-12-07 · CIN C 7.5W CRC Lynch · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Cari Carter
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 1-6
W
2025-11-09 · CIN C 7.5W CRC Lynch · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Emily Hon
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2025-11-02 · CIN C 7.5W CRC Lynch · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Emily Hon
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 4-6, 1-0
W
2025-07-08 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Emily Turner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W
2025-07-01 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Stefanie Horwitz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams9 teams · 2024–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
2.5
80%
4W–1L · 58% of games
3.0
85.7%
6W–1L · 66.7% of games
3.5
84.6%
22W–4L · 66.4% of games
4.0
75%
9W–3L · 59.6% of games
6.5
75%
3W–1L · 65.6% of games
7.5
85.7%
6W–1L · 58.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 26% of the time
#1 Singles
26%
16 matches
#3 Doubles
25%
15 matches
#2 Doubles
23%
14 matches
#1 Doubles
21%
13 matches
#2 Singles
5%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer