← Search

Ann Jerome

Austin, TX
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
160 matches · 96W–64L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Ann Jerome to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history160 matches
W
2026-08-29 · Silver Servers · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Brad Jerome mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-08-08 · Hit Squad · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Julie Asbra
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
L
2026-08-01 · Silver Servers · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Paul Shuler mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 2-6
W
2026-07-25 · Silver Servers · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Cho Law mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-18 · Hit Squad · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Julie Asbra
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-06-27 · Bodhi Balls · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jodi Allen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-5
L
2026-06-27 · Silver Servers · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with David Milem mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-23 · BallHERS · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Noemi Copeland
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
W
2026-06-12 · BallHERS · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Noemi Copeland
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
L
2026-06-10 · Tough Love · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kathy Lampert
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-06 · Bodhi Balls · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Matilda O'Connor
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-6
L
2026-06-03 · Tough Love · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Julie Asbra
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams23 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
63.6%
7W–4L · 58.9% of games
3.5
68.9%
51W–23L · 57.3% of games
4.0
59.3%
16W–11L · 55.7% of games
7.0
75%
12W–4L · 57.9% of games
7.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
27.6%
8W–21L · 39.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 38% of the time
#1 Doubles
38%
61 matches
#3 Doubles
21%
34 matches
#2 Doubles
14%
23 matches
#2 Singles
11%
18 matches
#1 Singles
11%
17 matches
#4 Doubles
4%
7 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You can get through anything if you keep going one point at a time.
Arthur Ashe