← Search

Emily Van Court

Austin, TX
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
143 matches · 110W–33L · seasons 2022–2027

Captains: add Emily Van Court to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history143 matches
W
2026-09-08 · #2 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-08-25 · The Volley Llamas · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Tawney Booth
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
L
2026-07-18 · The Volley Llamas · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Natalie Duvall
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-2, 0-1
L
2026-06-27 · Whatasmash · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Erika Rodriguez
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 1-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-16 · 18+ Team Althea Gibson · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Christina Hiltscher
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-14 · Whatasmash · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Christina Hiltscher
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-06-09 · 18+ Team Althea Gibson · #2 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
W
2026-06-06 · Whatasmash · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Christina Hiltscher
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 5-4
L
2026-05-19 · 18+ Team Althea Gibson · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Beth Utley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-7
L
2026-05-18 · 18+ Team Althea Gibson · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Michelle Walker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-05-12 · 18+ Team Althea Gibson · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Christina Hiltscher
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-05-04 · 18+ Team Althea Gibson · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Samantha Pearson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams19 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
100%
13W–0L · 75.7% of games
3.5
89.5%
17W–2L · 72.2% of games
4.0
93.1%
27W–2L · 72.1% of games
4.5
65.4%
51W–27L · 55.7% of games
8.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 34% of the time
#1 Doubles
34%
48 matches
#3 Doubles
27%
39 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
38 matches
#1 Singles
6%
8 matches
#2 Singles
6%
8 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer