← Search

Troy Casper

Eagle, ID
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
212 matches · 131W–81L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Troy Casper to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history212 matches
L
2026-08-01 · #1 Doubles · with Jeff Huhn championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-17 · #1 Doubles · with Eric Sauder championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-7
W
2026-06-18 · Racket Posse 18+ · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with David Roberts
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-06-17 · Old Enough · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Roger Quarles
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 7-5, 1-0
W
2026-06-11 · Racket Posse 18+ · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-06-09 · Racket Posse 18+ · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-04 · Racket Posse 18+ · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Andrew Bidou
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-1, 0-1
W
2026-06-04 · Old Enough · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with John Chavez
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 5-7, 1-0
W
2026-06-02 · Racket Posse 18+ · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
W
2026-05-28 · Racket Posse 18+ · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with James Mertz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-05-27 · Old Enough · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jon Hancock
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-05-14 · You Can't be Serious · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Chad Anderson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams33 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
3.0
75%
12W–4L · 67.5% of games
3.5
74.5%
35W–12L · 62.4% of games
4.0
43.8%
7W–9L · 49.2% of games
7.0
84.2%
16W–3L · 60.2% of games
6.0mixed
80%
4W–1L · 65.1% of games
6.5mixed
100%
6W–0L · 86.7% of games
7.0mixed
68.6%
24W–11L · 54.4% of games
7.5mixed
41.7%
5W–7L · 49% of games
8.0mixed
60%
12W–8L · 55.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 38% of the time
#1 Doubles
38%
81 matches
#2 Doubles
21%
44 matches
#1 Singles
17%
35 matches
#3 Doubles
17%
35 matches
#2 Singles
8%
17 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova