← Search

Joanne Grzembski

Webster, MA
3.5A year-end 2025
i
Appeal — granted on request, not computed
150 matches · 94W–56L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Joanne Grzembski to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history150 matches
W
2026-09-01 · BRY: Joan Steere · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with MICHAEL FONTAINE mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 6-4, 2-1
W
2026-08-27 · BRY: Joan Steere · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Joshua Bell mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-4
W
2026-08-06 · BRY: 55+/Joan Steere · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Rhonda Carvalhal
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-08-02 · BRY: Joan Steere · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Neal Rainey mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-1
W
2026-07-27 · BRY: 55+/Joan Steere · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kathleen Mello
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-07-26 · BRY: Joan Steere · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Neal Rainey mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-07-23 · BRY: 55+/Joan Steere · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jessica Pendleton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-07-21 · BRY: Ladies/Joan Steere · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with RANDI SKODRAS
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 5-3
W
2026-07-19 · BRY: 55+/Joan Steere · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jessica Pendleton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-07-17 · BRY: Ladies/Joan Steere · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with RANDI SKODRAS
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 3-6, 6-5
W
2026-07-14 · NETC:Queens of the Court:Rogers/Vaugh · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Whitney Brown
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-07-13 · BRY: 55+/Joan Steere · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kathleen Mello
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-3, 2-5
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams41 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
100%
7W–0L · 77.4% of games
3.5
75.9%
41W–13L · 57.7% of games
4.0
39.1%
9W–14L · 44.5% of games
7.0
70%
7W–3L · 62.4% of games
7.0mixed
67.6%
25W–12L · 57.7% of games
8.0mixed
26.3%
5W–14L · 46.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 31% of the time
#2 Doubles
31%
47 matches
#1 Doubles
31%
46 matches
#3 Doubles
20%
30 matches
#1 Singles
15%
23 matches
#2 Singles
3%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer