← Search

Marissa Kleber

— year-end
70 matches · 42W–28L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Marissa Kleber to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history70 matches
L
2026-09-11 · RKartes/JGrahl (Queens) · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Laura Brown
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-09-07 · MKleber/LGrant (Queens) · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Emily Louis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-09-04 · RKartes/JGrahl (Queens) · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Amy Varner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
L
2026-08-31 · MKleber/LGrant (Queens) · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Laura Grant
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-08-21 · RKartes/JGrahl (Queens) · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Amy Varner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-17 · MKleber/LGrant (Queens) · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Emily Louis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-0
L
2026-03-02 · MKleber (Queens) · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ashley Hall
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
2025-11-13 · #1 Doubles · with Mallory Miller championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
L
2025-10-22 · #1 Doubles · with Liz Ostrow championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2025-10-10 · MKleber (Park Road) · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Elizabeth Golden
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L
2025-10-07 · MKleber (Park Road) · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Peggy Hoffman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2025-10-03 · JGrahl/RKartes (Queens) · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Amy Varner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-6
Teams33 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level10 levels played
3.0
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5
66.7%
6W–3L · 59.4% of games
4.0
57.1%
8W–6L · 52.8% of games
5.5
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.5
100%
4W–0L · 75.8% of games
7.5
50%
9W–9L · 53.5% of games
8.5
50%
2W–2L · 50% of games
3.5mixed
80%
4W–1L · 68.2% of games
4.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 46% of the time
#3 Doubles
46%
32 matches
#1 Doubles
29%
20 matches
#2 Doubles
20%
14 matches
#1 Singles
4%
3 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer