← Search

Janet Lasken

Derwood, MD
3.0C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
25 matches · 10W–15L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Janet Lasken to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history25 matches
W
2026-07-18 · Hoferek - Aspen Hill · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Helen Mahoney
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-11 · Hoferek - Aspen Hill · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Nancy Davis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 0-6, 0-1
L
2026-06-27 · Hoferek - Aspen Hill · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Paula Kurtzweil Walter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-13 · Hoferek - Aspen Hill · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Helen Mahoney
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-7
W
2026-06-12 · Rabin · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Chung Kim
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
L
2026-06-09 · Rabin · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Susan Greenwood
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
L
2026-05-26 · Rabin · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Marjorie Guroff
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 3-6
W
2026-05-09 · Hoferek - Aspen Hill · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Karen Rabin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 5-4
L
2026-05-02 · Hoferek - Aspen Hill · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jane Acri
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 4-6
W
2026-04-28 · Rabin · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Loistene Lassiter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-04-23 · Rabin · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jane Acri
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
L
2025-06-20 · Davis 6.5 · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Susan Greenwood
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams16 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.0
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.0
50%
9W–9L · 48.8% of games
6.5
0%
0W–4L · 30.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 52% of the time
#2 Doubles
52%
13 matches
#3 Doubles
36%
9 matches
#1 Doubles
12%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe