← Search

Elizabeth Sharp

BROOKLYN, NY
3.0C year-end 2023
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
62 matches · 35W–27L · seasons 2021–2024

Captains: add Elizabeth Sharp to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history62 matches
L
2024-04-12 · Korngut/Martin · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with CARLA GALLARDO
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 1-6
L
2024-04-07 · Bhagwagar/McHugh · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Leonardo King mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 2-6
W
2023-12-06 · Bhagwagar/McHugh · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Leonardo King mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 4-6, 1-0
L
2023-12-03 · Sisk/Rohr D1 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Alex Bublichenko mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 4-6
L
2023-08-12 · #1 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
W
2023-08-12 · #3 Doubles · with Erica Korngut championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
2023-08-11 · #3 Doubles · with Erica Korngut championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-3
W
2023-07-23 · #3 Doubles · with Erica Korngut championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
W
Lisa Bohen / Elizabeth Larsen
2023-07-11 · #1 Doubles · with Jessica Sasaki championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 2-4
W
2023-06-22 · Williams/Kitchener · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 5-4
L
2023-06-13 · Williams/Kitchener · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 3-6
W
2023-06-04 · Williams/Kitchener · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams20 teams · 2021–2024
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
2.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.0
57.7%
15W–11L · 51.3% of games
3.5
20%
1W–4L · 44.1% of games
6.0mixed
42.9%
3W–4L · 53.2% of games
7.0mixed
61.1%
11W–7L · 50.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 39% of the time
#1 Doubles
39%
24 matches
#3 Doubles
24%
15 matches
#1 Singles
19%
12 matches
#2 Doubles
11%
7 matches
#2 Singles
7%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer