← Search

Amy Clayton

Duluth, GA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
81 matches · 64W–17L · seasons 2022–2027

Captains: add Amy Clayton to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history81 matches
L
2026-07-05 · St Ives (Susan Oh)* · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-1, 1-6
W
2026-06-28 · St Ives (Susan Oh)* · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Deniece Toth
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-5
W
2026-06-25 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Anna Logue
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-06-21 · St Ives (Susan Oh)* · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Susan Oh
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 0-6, 5-7
W
Robin Mittelstadt / Martha Shadle
2026-06-18 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mary Brantley Nalley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-06-18 · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tracey Clark
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-06-14 · St Ives (Susan Oh)* · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Susan Oh
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-11 · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
Paige Byers / Alexis Simpson
2026-06-04 · #4 Doubles · 3.0 · with Corrie Crews
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
W
2026-06-04 · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-05-31 · St Ives (Susan Oh)* · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Deniece Toth
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 5-7, 6-2
W
2026-05-28 · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 7-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams6 teams · 2025–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.0
87.5%
14W–2L · 70.3% of games
3.5
78.3%
47W–13L · 58.7% of games
4.0
60%
3W–2L · 54% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 70% of the time
#1 Singles
70%
57 matches
#1 Doubles
11%
9 matches
#2 Doubles
5%
4 matches
#3 Doubles
5%
4 matches
#4 Doubles
5%
4 matches
#2 Singles
4%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer