← Search

Jana Burns

Fort Collins, CO
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
76 matches · 44W–32L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Jana Burns to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history76 matches
W
Pamela Massaro / Mary Wright
2026-08-03 · FCCC BLUE · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Deanna Verchick
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-3
L
2026-06-17 · FCCC SILVER · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Molly Skold
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-06-12 · FCCC PURPLE · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Julie Chan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
W
2026-06-10 · FCCC SILVER · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Tara Delaney
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-05-24 · FCCC RED · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Raghu Raj Prasanna Kumar mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-0
L
2026-05-11 · FCCC WHITE · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Deanna Verchick
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-05-08 · FCCC PURPLE · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Molly Skold
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-04 · FCCC WHITE · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Hannah Burns
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-0
L
2026-05-01 · FCCC PURPLE · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Pam Raab
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
W
2026-04-13 · FCCC WHITE · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Ashley McLaughlin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-04-11 · FCCC ORANGE · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Megan Kushner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-5, 0-1
L
2025-08-25 · FCCC YELLOW · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Teresa Nugent
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-7
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams29 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
2.5
60%
21W–14L · 54.4% of games
3.0
60%
18W–12L · 57.1% of games
6.0
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
42.9%
3W–4L · 49.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 54% of the time
#1 Doubles
54%
41 matches
#2 Doubles
36%
27 matches
#1 Singles
5%
4 matches
#3 Doubles
5%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Pressure is a privilege.
Billie Jean King