← Search

Andrea Eads

Muncie, IN
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
38 matches · 21W–17L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Andrea Eads to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history38 matches
L
2026-09-10 · Low Tri W MRC Kubek · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Natalie Robbins
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-09-03 · Low Tri W MRC Kubek · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Choey Kubek
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-08-27 · Low Tri W MRC Kubek · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Choey Kubek
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-08-06 · Low Tri W MRC Kubek · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Natalie Robbins
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-7, 1-0
W
2026-07-20 · Indy A40 3.5W MRC Knapp · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Amanda Rammel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-1
W
2026-06-20 · Indy A40 3.5W MRC Knapp · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Hense
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-06-15 · Indy A40 3.5W MRC Knapp · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Amanda Rammel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-06-13 · Indy A40 3.5W MRC Knapp · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Amanda Rammel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
W
2026-06-08 · Indy A40 3.5W MRC Knapp · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Amanda Rammel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-06-06 · Indy A40 3.5W MRC Knapp · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Amanda Rammel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-06-01 · Indy A40 3.5W MRC Knapp · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Amanda Rammel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
W
2024-07-22 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Barbara Lockhart
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams2 teams · 2026–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
2.5
50%
2W–2L · 49.3% of games
3.5
70.4%
19W–8L · 55.7% of games
4.0
0%
0W–7L · 33.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 32% of the time
#2 Doubles
32%
12 matches
#1 Doubles
29%
11 matches
#1 Singles
24%
9 matches
#3 Doubles
11%
4 matches
#2 Singles
5%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I don’t want to be somebody else. I want to be myself and win in my way.
Rafael Nadal