← Search

Camille Pauly

Gainesville, FL
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
127 matches · 79W–48L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Camille Pauly to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history127 matches
L
2026-08-16 · 300/Wimsett-Spink 7.0 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Steven Smith mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W
Andrew Messenger / Lindsey Wilson
2026-08-15 · 300/Pauly · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Alejandro Pauly mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-07-24 · 300/Pauly · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Alejandro Pauly mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-23 · 300/Wimsett-Spink 7.0 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Steven Smith mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-07-18 · 300/Wimsett-Spink 7.0 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Steven Smith mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-05-09 · 300 Club Pauly · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Caroline Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-04-18 · 300 Club Pauly · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Caroline Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-03-27 · 300 Pauly · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jigisha Shah
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-03-25 · 300 Wimsett/Spink · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Steven Smith mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-03-14 · 300 Pauly · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jigisha Shah
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-03-02 · 300-Pauly · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Alejandro Pauly mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-02-13 · 300-Pauly · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Alejandro Pauly mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams40 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.0
62.1%
18W–11L · 51.8% of games
3.5
26.7%
4W–11L · 39.5% of games
5.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.5
75%
6W–2L · 57.7% of games
6.0mixed
66.7%
8W–4L · 62% of games
7.0mixed
70%
21W–9L · 57.3% of games
8.0mixed
50%
2W–2L · 49.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 43% of the time
#1 Doubles
43%
55 matches
#3 Doubles
32%
40 matches
#2 Doubles
21%
26 matches
#1 Singles
2%
3 matches
#2 Singles
2%
2 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams