← Search

Tiffany Rowell

— year-end
108 matches · 82W–26L · seasons 2022–2027

Captains: add Tiffany Rowell to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history108 matches
L
2026-08-22 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Brilynn Fields
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-1, 0-1
L
2026-08-15 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Blair Bleiman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 3-6
L
Adrienne Nielsen / Jennifer Hanson
2026-07-09 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Elizabeth Rhoades
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 2-6, 5-7
W
2026-07-05 · White Columns (Tiffany Rowell)* · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sarah Pender
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-06-28 · White Columns (Tiffany Rowell)* · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Maggie Manusama
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 1-6, 6-7
W
2026-06-26 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Dana Kay
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-06-25 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Dana Kay
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 1-6
W
2026-06-19 · White Columns (Tiffany Rowell)* · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lindsey Ferguson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 6-3
L
2026-06-11 · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-05-14 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lauren A Loeb
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
W
2026-04-18 · USTA Atlanta/Laurie Schmidt · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Maria Pacheco
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-03-28 · USTA Atlanta/Laurie Schmidt · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Maria Pacheco
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
Teams18 teams · 2022–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
2.5
80%
4W–1L · 67.6% of games
3.0
90.9%
20W–2L · 71.3% of games
3.5
72.5%
37W–14L · 58.2% of games
4.0
62.5%
10W–6L · 54.2% of games
7.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
3.0mixed
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.5mixed
88.9%
8W–1L · 56.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 43% of the time
#1 Doubles
43%
46 matches
#1 Singles
19%
20 matches
#2 Doubles
19%
20 matches
#3 Doubles
14%
15 matches
#2 Singles
7%
7 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams