← Search

Mary Yarbrough

— year-end
35 matches · 19W–16L · seasons 2025–2026

Captains: add Mary Yarbrough to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history35 matches
W
2026-07-07 · GR-Colie (40s 3.0 MX) · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Greg Baggett mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-2
L
2026-06-09 · GR-Colie (40s 3.0 MX) · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mark Wuntke mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 4-6
L
2026-05-30 · OP-Pana/Yarb (40s 3.0W SP) Queens of Clay · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Tracy Taylor
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 5-7
W
2026-05-23 · OP-Pana/Yarb (40s 3.0W SP) Queens of Clay · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Tracy Taylor
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-05-09 · OP-Pana/Yarb (40s 3.0W SP) Queens of Clay · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Dani Merville
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 4-6
L
2026-04-25 · OP-Pana/Yarb (40s 3.0W SP) Queens of Clay · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lori Baker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
2026-04-12 · OP-Pana/Yarb (40s 3.0W SP) Queens of Clay · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lulu Conekin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-7
W
2026-04-04 · #3 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
L
Jennifer Hall / Lori Wagner
2026-03-30 · OP-Pana/Yarb (40s 3.0W SP) Queens of Clay · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Patricia Sena-Bolding
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 4-6, 0-1
L
Jennifer Hall
2026-03-29 · OP-Pana/Yarb (40s 3.0W SP) Queens of Clay · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
L
Christie Teaney / Paige Anderson
2026-03-21 · OP-Pana/Yarb (40s 3.0W SP) Queens of Clay · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Patricia Sena-Bolding
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-03-14 · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
Teams5 teams · 2025–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
2.5
69.2%
9W–4L · 59% of games
3.0
30.8%
4W–9L · 46.2% of games
5.5
71.4%
5W–2L · 59.7% of games
3.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 43% of the time
#1 Doubles
43%
15 matches
#2 Doubles
20%
7 matches
#1 Singles
14%
5 matches
#2 Singles
9%
3 matches
#3 Doubles
9%
3 matches
#3 Singles
6%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams