← Search

Heleen Honeyborne

Alpharetta, GA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
67 matches · 42W–25L · seasons 2022–2027

Captains: add Heleen Honeyborne to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history67 matches
W
2026-06-18 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Polly Schwartz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
W
2026-06-11 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Danielle Rudolph
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-5
L
2026-06-04 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mariah Mirchandani
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-2, 1-6
W
2026-05-28 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Polly Schwartz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-05-14 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Polly Schwartz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
L
2026-01-08 · Crooked Creek (Kim Wildstein)* · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jennfier Toeppner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
L
2025-12-04 · Crooked Creek (Kim Wildstein)* · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2025-11-20 · Crooked Creek (Kim Wildstein)* · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Elaine Welch
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 5-7
L
2025-07-10 · Crooked Creek (Kim Wildstein)* · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Elaine Welch
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
2025-06-19 · Crooked Creek (Kim Wildstein)* · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 0-6
L
2025-06-12 · Crooked Creek (Kim Wildstein)* · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jennfier Toeppner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
L
2025-05-15 · Crooked Creek (Kim Wildstein)* · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams9 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
2.5
78.6%
11W–3L · 60.5% of games
3.0
65.9%
27W–14L · 57.9% of games
3.5
80%
4W–1L · 60.4% of games
4.0
0%
0W–7L · 28.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 40% of the time
#1 Doubles
40%
27 matches
#1 Singles
25%
17 matches
#2 Doubles
24%
16 matches
#2 Singles
5%
3 matches
#3 Doubles
3%
2 matches
#4 Doubles
3%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams