← Search

Richard Schwab

— year-end
36 matches · 7W–29L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Richard Schwab to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history36 matches
L
2026-08-22 · SD LT SDTRC (Noon)/ Faltico · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with David Goodwin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
L
2026-08-01 · SD LT SDTRC (Noon)/ Faltico · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Shawn Pollard
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-7
L
2026-07-25 · SD LT SDTRC (Noon)/ Faltico · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Shawn Pollard
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
L
2026-07-18 · SD 7.0 SDTRC/ Cox · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kim Schwab mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 5-7
L
2026-06-28 · SD LT SDTRC (Noon)/ Faltico · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with David Goodwin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-06-27 · SD 7.0 SDTRC/ Cox · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kim Schwab mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-06-14 · SD 3.5 SDTRC (3:2)/ Wurster · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with John Masterson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
L
2026-05-24 · SD 3.5 SDTRC (3:2)/ Wurster · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Robert Dragasits
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-05-17 · SD 3.5 SDTRC (3:2)/ Wurster · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sujantra Mckeever
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 5-7
L
2026-05-03 · SD 3.5 SDTRC (3:2)/ Wurster · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with John Masterson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
L
2026-04-26 · SD 3.5 SDTRC (3:2)/ Wurster · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sujantra Mckeever
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-04-19 · SD 3.5 SDTRC (3:2)/ Wurster · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with John Masterson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
Teams17 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
0%
0W–4L · 32.9% of games
3.5
5.3%
1W–18L · 35.6% of games
6.5mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
55.6%
5W–4L · 52% of games
7.5mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 72% of the time
#3 Doubles
72%
26 matches
#2 Doubles
25%
9 matches
#1 Doubles
3%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer