← Search

Amy Feigenbaum

Duluth, GA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
40 matches · 22W–18L · seasons 2022–2027

Captains: add Amy Feigenbaum to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history40 matches
W
2026-07-09 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Claire Elanjian
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-2, 6-2
L
2026-06-25 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lisa Charron
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-18 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Laura Taylor
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-06-11 · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Amy Gabelman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-4
L
2026-06-04 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Colleen Ivy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-7
L
2026-05-28 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ariadne Quinones
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 2-6, 5-7
L
2026-05-14 · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
Lisa Rivas / Stephanie Lee
2026-01-16 · St. Ives (Dianne Willis)* · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Laura Taylor
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
Soo Jin Lee / Sue Kim
2026-01-08 · St. Ives (Dianne Willis)* · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Claire Elanjian
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
L
2026-01-08 · St. Ives (Colleen Ivy)* · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Megan Ryan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2025-12-11 · St. Ives (Colleen Ivy)* · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lisa Charron
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 6-7
W
2025-12-04 · St. Ives (Colleen Ivy)* · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tonya Magill
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 7-5
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams7 teams · 2025–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
2.5
60%
3W–2L · 59.3% of games
3.0
63.6%
14W–8L · 56% of games
3.5
38.5%
5W–8L · 47.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 43% of the time
#1 Doubles
43%
17 matches
#2 Doubles
25%
10 matches
#3 Doubles
15%
6 matches
#1 Singles
13%
5 matches
#4 Doubles
5%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Start where you are. Use what you have. Do what you can.
Arthur Ashe