← Search

JULIE GIBSON

LONGMONT, CO
2.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
44 matches · 25W–19L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add JULIE GIBSON to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history44 matches
W
2026-09-02 · BTA-IBM ORANGE · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Grace Graham
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-19 · BTA-IBM ORANGE · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Kari Heaney
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
W
2026-07-22 · BTA-IBM ORANGE · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Amy Franke
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-4
W
2026-07-08 · BTA-C YELLOW · #1 Singles · 2.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-6
W
2026-07-01 · BTA-C YELLOW · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Alexandra Zabierek
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-06-17 · BTA-C YELLOW · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Amy Scheff
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
W
2026-05-27 · BTA-C YELLOW · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Amy Franke
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
L
2026-04-29 · BTA-C YELLOW · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Alexandra Zabierek
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-7
W
2026-04-15 · BTA-C YELLOW · #1 Singles · 2.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 1-6, 1-0
W
2025-08-27 · RMTC GREEN · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Amy Franke
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
2025-08-20 · RMTC GREEN · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Amy Scheff
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 4-6, 1-0
L
2025-08-13 · RMTC GREEN · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Hillary Rosner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-3, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams14 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
2.5
61.8%
21W–13L · 55.7% of games
3.0
20%
1W–4L · 29.9% of games
6.0mixed
75%
3W–1L · 51.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 48% of the time
#1 Doubles
48%
21 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
13 matches
#3 Doubles
16%
7 matches
#1 Singles
7%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The moment of victory is much too short to live for that and nothing else.
Martina Navratilova