← Search

Emily Mattes

Milton, FL
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
23 matches · 17W–6L · seasons 2025–2026

Captains: add Emily Mattes to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history23 matches
W
2026-08-30 · LeCoq - RS Clay · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mark Brabham mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-07-22 · LeCoq - RS Clay · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Patrick Mrachek mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-06-17 · McCall - RS Clay · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-06-10 · McCall - RS Clay · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Shellie McCall
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-3
W
2026-04-28 · Bryan - RS Clay · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-04-22 · Escambia/McCall · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lisa Bew
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-04-21 · Bryan - RS Clay · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mary Bryan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-2
W
2026-03-29 · Bryan - RS Clay · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mary Bryan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-5
L
2026-03-18 · Escambia/McCall · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-03-12 · Bryan - RS Clay · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mary Bryan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-02-16 · LeCoq - RS Clay · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with John Whitehead mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-02-11 · LeCoq - RS Clay · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with John Whitehead mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams16 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.5
61.5%
8W–5L · 55.3% of games
4.0
75%
3W–1L · 61.8% of games
7.0mixed
100%
6W–0L · 67.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 39% of the time
#1 Doubles
39%
9 matches
#2 Doubles
26%
6 matches
#3 Doubles
17%
4 matches
#1 Singles
9%
2 matches
#2 Singles
4%
1 match
#4 Doubles
4%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert