← Search

Danika Holt

Grand Junction, CO
3.0A year-end 2025
i
Appeal — granted on request, not computed
80 matches · 34W–46L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Danika Holt to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history80 matches
L
2026-09-04 · GJTC KLANGSTON · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kimberly Langston
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-08-31 · GJTC KLANGSTON · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-4
L
2026-08-21 · GJTC KLANGSTON · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Anne Ownby
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-08-03 · GJTC KLANGSTON · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-2
W
2026-07-27 · GJTC KLANGSTON · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Michelle Blanck
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-07-13 · GJTC KLANGSTON · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-07-12 · GJTC KLANGSTON · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-06-29 · GJTC KLANGSTON · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kimberly Langston
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
L
2026-06-15 · GJTC KLANGSTON · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 7-5, 0-1
L
2026-06-08 · GJTC KLANGSTON · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-01 · GJTC KLANGSTON · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Michelle Blanck
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-05-27 · GJTC KLANGSTON · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 2-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams19 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
2.5
76.9%
10W–3L · 58.6% of games
3.0
37.7%
20W–33L · 43.6% of games
6.0mixed
57.1%
4W–3L · 50.4% of games
6.5mixed
0%
0W–5L · 23.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 29% of the time
#3 Doubles
29%
23 matches
#2 Doubles
25%
20 matches
#1 Singles
24%
19 matches
#1 Doubles
16%
13 matches
#2 Singles
6%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova