← Search

Paul Cavell

— year-end
114 matches · 51W–63L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Paul Cavell to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history114 matches
L
2026-08-17 · Haynie/18/5.5/CM/POTC · #2 Doubles · 5.5 · with Marshall Haynie
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-6
L
2026-08-11 · Stanton/18/3-3.5-4/TM/POTC · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Myles Roberts
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-08-06 · Stanton/18/3-3.5-4/TM/POTC · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Myles Roberts
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-07-13 · Stanton/18/3-3.5-4/TM/POTC · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Byron Landon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-22 · Stanton/18/3-3.5-4/TM/POTC · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Morgan Rogers
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-01 · McCoy/18/3.5/MXD/POTC · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Caroline Landon mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 0-6
W
2026-04-28 · McCoy/18/3.5/MXD/POTC · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Emily Overdyke mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-04-21 · McCoy/18/3.5/MXD/POTC · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Amy Stafford mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-04-08 · McCoy/40/3.5/MXD/POTC · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with MLiss Sella mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 3-6
L
2026-04-07 · McCoy/18/3.5/MXD/POTC · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Karen McCoy mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 4-6
L
2026-03-25 · Wolf-Armstrong/18/3.5/M/POTC · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
W
2026-03-24 · Wolf-Armstrong/18/3.5/M/POTC · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-3, 1-0
Teams39 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.0
50%
24W–24L · 51% of games
3.5
23.8%
5W–16L · 38.7% of games
4.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
5.5
63.6%
7W–4L · 58.8% of games
6.5
20%
2W–8L · 35.9% of games
3.0mixed
66.7%
10W–5L · 55.2% of games
3.5mixed
28.6%
2W–5L · 38.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 40% of the time
#3 Doubles
40%
45 matches
#1 Doubles
24%
27 matches
#2 Doubles
22%
25 matches
#1 Singles
9%
10 matches
#2 Singles
6%
7 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova