← Search

Deanna Ellmer

Seattle, WA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
50 matches · 24W–26L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Deanna Ellmer to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history50 matches
W
2026-04-19 · NTC-Double Shotz-Quam · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Irene Chen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-03-21 · #1 Female Doubles · with Irene Chen championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6
W
2026-03-21 · #1 Female Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4
L
2026-03-01 · TCSP-Co(ed) Conspiracy and Racqueteering-Garrett · #1 Female Doubles · 4.0 · with Kelli Corbett mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6
W
N/A
2026-02-28 · HBSQ-Nearly Expired-Yu · #1 Female Doubles · 3.5 · with Irene Chen mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0
W
N/A
2026-02-28 · HBSQ-Nearly Expired-Yu · #1 Female Singles · 3.5 mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0
W
N/A
2026-02-28 · HBSQ-Nearly Expired-Yu · #2 Mixed Doubles · 3.5 · with Scott Marcus mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0
W
Paggy Jing Nie / Keira Gao
2026-02-13 · HBSQ-Nearly Expired-Yu · #1 Female Doubles · 3.5 · with Irene Chen mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2
L
Faith Beers / Vanessa Zakhour
2026-01-30 · TCSP-Co(ed) Conspiracy and Racqueteering-Garrett · #1 Female Doubles · 4.0 · with Kelli Corbett mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-6
W
2026-01-24 · HBSQ-Nearly Expired-Yu · #1 Female Doubles · 3.5 · with Ali Jones mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2
W
2026-01-24 · HBSQ-Nearly Expired-Yu · #1 Female Singles · 3.5 mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1
W
2026-01-23 · TCSP-Co(ed) Conspiracy and Racqueteering-Garrett · #1 Female Doubles · 4.0 · with Erin Hostetler mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams14 teams · 2024–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.5
60%
3W–2L · 51.5% of games
4.0
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
3.5mixed
87.5%
7W–1L · 73.7% of games
4.0mixed
26.3%
5W–14L · 40.1% of games
7.0mixed
75%
3W–1L · 59% of games
8.0mixed
66.7%
4W–2L · 55.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Female Doubles, 32% of the time
#1 Female Doubles
32%
16 matches
#1 Female Singles
20%
10 matches
#2 Doubles
12%
6 matches
#1 Doubles
8%
4 matches
#1 Singles
8%
4 matches
#3 Doubles
8%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova