← Search

Jane Fields

Saint Paul, MN
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
45 matches · 33W–12L · seasons 2025–2026

Captains: add Jane Fields to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history45 matches
L
2026-06-18 · Hommeyer/Hulbert · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sara Erickson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-08 · Creighton Chip & Charge · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Amy Wix
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-7, 1-0
W
2026-06-04 · Hommeyer/Hulbert · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rita McDonald
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-3
W
2026-06-02 · Townsend/Osberg · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sara Erickson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-28 · Hommeyer/Hulbert · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-05-19 · Townsend/Osberg · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rachel Reese
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-3
W
2026-05-18 · Creighton Chip & Charge · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Lorraine Hulbert
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-14 · Hommeyer/Hulbert · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sara Erickson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-6
W
2026-05-12 · Townsend/Osberg · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sara Erickson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-5
L
2026-05-05 · Townsend/Osberg · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rachel Reese
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-7, 0-1
L
2026-05-04 · Creighton Chip & Charge · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Susan Hommeyer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
W
2026-04-28 · McDonald: Terminetters · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rita McDonald
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams37 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
4.0
73.8%
31W–11L · 57.1% of games
8.0
2W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 42% of the time
#2 Doubles
42%
19 matches
#3 Doubles
27%
12 matches
#1 Doubles
18%
8 matches
#4 Doubles
9%
4 matches
#1 Singles
4%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Pressure is a privilege.
Billie Jean King