← Search

Carla Forgham

Danville, CA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
38 matches · 19W–19L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Carla Forgham to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history38 matches
W
Angie Keehn / Nellie Hill
2026-09-10 · DIABLO CC CW6.5A · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Nancy Daetz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-1
L
2026-08-09 · DIABLO CC 40MX6.0A · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Morgan Becker mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-7
W
2026-08-02 · DIABLO CC 40MX6.0A · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Christopher Pentes mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 6-1, 1-0
L
2026-07-30 · DIABLO CC 40MX6.0A · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Richard Forgham mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 1-6
W
2026-07-16 · DIABLO CC 40MX6.0A · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Richard Forgham mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 1-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-22 · DIABLO CC 40MX6.0A · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Richard Forgham mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 7-5
L
2026-06-13 · DIABLO CC 18AW3.5A · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-06-10 · DIABLO CC 18AW3.0A · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-5
W
2026-06-04 · DIABLO CC 18AW2.5+B-DT · #1 Singles · 2.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
L
2026-06-03 · DIABLO CC 18AW3.5A · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
L
2026-06-01 · DIABLO CC 18AW3.5A-DT · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-05-30 · DIABLO CC 18AW3.5A · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Marilee Headen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams50 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
2.5
80%
4W–1L · 50.6% of games
3.0
62.5%
5W–3L · 52% of games
3.5
23.1%
3W–10L · 34.5% of games
5.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
66.7%
6W–3L · 47.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 29% of the time
#3 Doubles
29%
11 matches
#1 Doubles
21%
8 matches
#2 Doubles
21%
8 matches
#1 Singles
18%
7 matches
#2 Singles
11%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova