← Search

Jason Barton

Loveland, CO
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
15 matches · 9W–6L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Jason Barton to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history15 matches
L
2026-07-16 · FCCC WHITE · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Brett Kemp
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-7
W
2026-07-15 · FCCC WHITE · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Raghu Raj Prasanna Kumar
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-07-08 · FCCC WHITE · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Robert Burck
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-03 · FCCC WHITE · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Joseph Roeder
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 4-6
L
2026-05-13 · FCCC WHITE · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Todd Gaines
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
2026-04-29 · FCCC WHITE · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Cody Forst
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
L
2026-04-22 · FCCC WHITE · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Joe Ostroski
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-6
W
2025-07-11 · FCCC SILVER · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Brett Kemp
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
W
2025-07-09 · FCCC SILVER · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Derek Metz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-1
W
2025-07-02 · FCCC SILVER · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Logan Hale
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
W
2025-04-16 · FCCC GREEN · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Matt Morgan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2024-05-15 · FCCC RED · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Chris Lidstone
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-1, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams8 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level1 levels played
3.0
60%
9W–6L · 56.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 40% of the time
#3 Doubles
40%
6 matches
#1 Doubles
33%
5 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova