← Search

Beth van Derslice

Sparks Glencoe, MD
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
90 matches · 57W–33L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Beth van Derslice to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history90 matches
W
2026-08-22 · Martell - Don’s Single Angels · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-08-06 · Martell - Don’s Single Angels · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-1
W
Tracy Waller
2026-08-04 · Martell - Don’s Single Angels · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
W
2026-03-11 · Baker 3.0-4.0 Tri · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sanghee Lee
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
L
2026-02-07 · Baker 3.0-4.0 Tri · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Julie Edwards
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 1-6, 0-1
W
2026-02-01 · Baker 3.0-4.0 Tri · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kimberly Ford
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
W
2026-01-16 · Baker 3.0-4.0 Tri · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Eva Simmons-O'Brien
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
W
2025-05-31 · Rauhofer - Volley Girls · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-6
W
2025-04-24 · Rauhofer - Volley Girls · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nikki Alworth
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-2
L
2025-03-29 · Baker · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Keetley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-2, 0-1
L
2025-03-15 · Baker · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kimberly Ford
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
2025-02-23 · Baker · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cintya Leveque
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-3, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams24 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
0.0
75%
9W–3L · 63.5% of games
2.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.0
72%
18W–7L · 61.8% of games
3.5
62.2%
23W–14L · 52.7% of games
6.0mixed
50%
3W–3L · 56.2% of games
7.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 36% of the time
#2 Doubles
36%
32 matches
#1 Doubles
33%
30 matches
#3 Doubles
22%
20 matches
#2 Singles
6%
5 matches
#1 Singles
3%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal