← Search

Hannah Mize

Columbus, GA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
30 matches · 20W–10L · seasons 2024–2027

Captains: add Hannah Mize to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history30 matches
W
2026-08-30 · Walters-GI · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Susan Evans
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-08-29 · Kelley-CCC · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Erin Trotter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
W
2026-08-03 · Neal-CCC · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jill Delaubell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-25 · Neal-CCC · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Gena Stone
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-7
W
2026-03-05 · Kelley-CCC · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jamie Stovall
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-3
W
2026-02-12 · Kelley-CCC · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Cortney Douglas
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-02-07 · Kelley-CCC · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Martha Meador
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
2026-01-21 · Kelley-CCC · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Emily Moore
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-01-17 · Mize/Davis-CCC · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Henry Barnes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
2025-12-20 · Mize/Davis-CCC · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Henry Barnes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-4
W
2025-10-22 · Kelley-CCC · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Cathryn Pease
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2025-10-04 · Kelley-CCC · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Martha Meador
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams27 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
2.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.0
70.8%
17W–7L · 56.5% of games
5.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 43% of the time
#3 Doubles
43%
13 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
10 matches
#1 Doubles
20%
6 matches
#2 Singles
3%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams