← Search

Meghan Wolfe

Denver, CO
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
56 matches · 30W–26L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Meghan Wolfe to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history56 matches
L
2026-08-31 · CM GREEN · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-08-03 · CM GREEN · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-13 · CM GREEN · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Megan Draper
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
L
2026-07-11 · #2 Doubles · with Pete Fredricks championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-5, 0-1
W
2026-07-11 · #1 Doubles · with Pete Fredricks championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 0-6, 1-0
W
Tony Auston / Ashley Bryngelson
2026-07-10 · #2 Doubles · with Pete Fredricks championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-10 · #1 Doubles · with Pete Fredricks championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-07-06 · CM GREEN · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Anne McWilliams
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-06-18 · CM BLUE · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kay Teitelbaum
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-06-17 · CM BLUE · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Ellen Putze
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
W
2026-06-15 · CM GREEN · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Megan Draper
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
L
2026-06-08 · CM GREEN · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Anne McWilliams
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams14 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.0
51.1%
24W–23L · 51.5% of games
6.0mixed
75%
3W–1L · 64.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 38% of the time
#1 Doubles
38%
21 matches
#1 Singles
23%
13 matches
#2 Doubles
23%
13 matches
#3 Doubles
9%
5 matches
#2 Singles
7%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams