← Search

Madhavi Vajani

— year-end
53 matches · 19W–34L · seasons 2022–2027

Captains: add Madhavi Vajani to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history53 matches
L
2026-07-09 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ann Keenum
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
L
Crysenthia Stewart / Shawn Davis
2026-06-30 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Courtney Dixon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 3-6
L
Cathrall Anderson / Kim Janke
2026-06-23 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Flaum
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 1-6
W
2026-06-18 · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Amanda Goldner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-1
L
2026-06-04 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cara Welin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
L
2026-03-10 · Chastain (Cathy Brown)* · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Courtney Dixon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-6
L
2026-02-24 · Chastain (Cathy Brown)* · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Renata Gibson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
W
2026-02-10 · Chastain (Cathy Brown)* · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Renata Gibson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
L
2026-01-15 · Chastain TC (Catherine Brown)* · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Catherine Brown
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 1-6
L
2026-01-08 · Chastain TC (Catherine Brown)* · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kendall Taylor
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
W
2026-01-06 · Meadowgrove (Sarah Ackerman)* · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Tina Reilly
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-3, 7-5
W
2025-12-11 · Chastain TC (Catherine Brown)* · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Catherine Brown
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-6
Teams8 teams · 2024–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
2.5
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.0
36.6%
15W–26L · 42.8% of games
3.5
22.2%
2W–7L · 39.7% of games
3.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 28% of the time
#3 Doubles
28%
15 matches
#1 Doubles
23%
12 matches
#2 Doubles
23%
12 matches
#2 Singles
19%
10 matches
#4 Doubles
6%
3 matches
#1 Singles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer